Rep. Crockett’s Anti-Corporate Stance Contradicted by Donations
Democratic Representative Jasmine Crockett of Texas, who rose to prominence as a vocal critic of corporate influence in politics, has accepted more than $370,000 from corporate political action committees since 2022, despite previously claiming to reject such funding. Financial records reveal a stark contrast between the firebrand lawmaker’s public messaging and her campaign’s funding sources, raising questions about consistency in her political positioning.
A 2020 social media post from Crockett claimed she had taken “zero dollars” from corporate PACs while criticizing her opponent for accepting $192,000 from such sources. However, campaign finance disclosures from that same period show 22 separate PAC contributions to her state representative campaign, ranging from $500 to $5,000, according to documents reviewed by The New York Post.

Evolving Funding Sources
Crockett’s political rise has coincided with a significant shift in her campaign financing. The 44-year-old congresswoman began her political career with primarily small-dollar donations but has since attracted substantial support from major corporations, labor unions, and cryptocurrency interests.
According to The Washington Examiner, Crockett’s federal donors include pharmaceutical companies AbbVie and Gilead Sciences, financial giants BlackRock and Goldman Sachs, defense contractors Lockheed Martin and RTX, and consumer brands including McDonald’s, Home Depot, CVS, and Toyota. This corporate support appears at odds with her continued public criticism of “corporate greed” and praise for colleagues who stand against “corporate interests.”
“What’s controversial about [PACs] is people fundamentally see it as an issue of buying one’s support,” explained Professor Matthew Foster, a government lecturer at American University. “Candidates and campaigns may avoid accepting them because of the optics as the average person fundamentally finds this very icky and sleazy and corrupt. It’s a visceral reaction.”
Lying Democrat Criminal Hypocrite Jasmine Crockett Took PAC Money Toohttps://t.co/Qgn9S3plGc
— Throwback C Magnon (@throwback_c) April 6, 2025
Cryptocurrency Industry Backing
Perhaps most notable in Crockett’s financial support was the massive influx of cryptocurrency industry money during her 2022 congressional campaign. Two super PACs linked to crypto leaders – including the since-disgraced Sam Bankman-Fried – spent over $2 million supporting her bid to replace retiring Democratic Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson.
These organizations, Protect our Future PAC and WEB3 Forward, were funded by crypto moguls including Bankman-Fried, Ben Horowitz, and Marc Andreessen. Their substantial investment helped Crockett secure victory in a competitive Democratic primary, establishing connections to an industry that has since faced increasing regulatory scrutiny.
REVEALED: Far-Left Democrat Jasmine Crockett Lied About Not Taking Corporate PAC Cash. https://t.co/3zafEZ7AQR
— MissDD2U (@MissDD39040256) April 6, 2025
Foreign Government-Funded Travel
Beyond campaign contributions, Crockett’s financial disclosures reveal a pattern of accepting expensive international trips funded by foreign governments – a new development since her election to Congress. In February 2023, just weeks after taking office, she embarked on a $17,500 trip to Doha, Qatar, paid for by the US-Qatar Business Council, which maintains ties to the Qatari government.
During this trip, Crockett enjoyed accommodations at the five-star Waldorf Astoria Lusail Doha and participated in meetings with high-ranking Qatari government officials. The US-Qatar Business Council, which arranged these meetings, counts among its leadership Sheikha Mayes bint Hamad Al Thani, a member of Qatar’s royal family, and maintains a partnership with the Gulf Times, a Qatari state-run news outlet.
Her 2023 financial disclosures also reveal cultural exchange trips funded by the governments of India and the United Arab Emirates. These foreign-funded excursions have raised additional questions about potential influence, particularly given Qatar’s controversial positions on various international issues.

Public Image vs. Private Funding
Crockett has emerged as one of the Democratic Party’s most outspoken progressive voices, frequently engaging in heated exchanges with Republican colleagues. She recently faced criticism for referring to wheelchair-using Texas Governor Greg Abbott as “Governor Hot Wheels,” a comment she later claimed was not related to his disability despite evidence suggesting otherwise.
The disconnect between her anti-corporate rhetoric and her acceptance of corporate PAC money presents a challenge to her carefully cultivated political image. When asked to comment on these apparent contradictions, Crockett’s office did not respond to specific inquiries, though her chief of staff has previously stated that “the congresswoman files her financial disclosures and all required documents in accordance with federal law.”
As Crockett continues to build her national profile through confrontational exchanges and progressive policy positions, the scrutiny of her funding sources offers voters additional context for evaluating her political messaging and commitment to her stated principles in an increasingly polarized political environment.